Debates Voting!

[RaD]

The following debates have taken place:



I r dedlokd (Against) Vs. Plan-B (For) - Television is a bad influence.

http://www.tech-gfx.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=19512

WIS (For) Vs. FriendlyGuy (Against) - Smoking in bars should be allowed.

http://www.tech-gfx.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=19513

IsuNnYi (For) Vs. bbob (Against) - The death penalty should be banned.

http://www.tech-gfx.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=19514

Inferno (For) Vs. !#Anarchy (Against) - Every country should have automatic organ donation.

http://www.tech-gfx.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=19515



Who may vote?

Everybody! Even the debaters!

However, the debaters may not vote for their own debate.

Please vote for every debate you are allowed to. And state WHY you voted for that person in that debate.


For example:

GOOD:

Plan-B - Good valid arguements. Etc.

BAD:

Anarchy - Cause she's smexeh!!


Please make a list of the debaters you would like to see in the next round. Like:

<NAME> - <REASON>

<NAME> - <REASON>

<NAME> - <REASON>


Voting will end next tuesday!

[RaD]

Let the voting begin!!

[AngleBox]

I r dedlokd gmv tv is not a bad influence its the person to start with thats the problem



FriendlyGuy gmv i think why should people kill me with 2nd hand smoke when i want a bee



IsuNnYi gmv i believe its wrong people should just rot in jail



inferno gmv for the simple fact auto donation is the way forward

[RaD]

Could you vote for every debate seperatly? Since there are 4 contestants going on to the second round;)

[bbob]

Deadlock - His points were valid even after plan-b's second reply.
WIS - Boo to legislation, yay for the free market. This was communicated very well.
Anarchy - A very simple point, though powerful none the less.

[Chris]

Bobbo - Making more sense than the other guy overall.
Anarchy - You go girl! Free will! :woot:

Didnt pay attention to the other ones as they didnt interest me much, and Plan B's way of writing annoys me............you......know....?.......

[Plan-B]

lmao mr viking, i'm gonna try and change that habit now :)
its a bad habit i picked up awhile ago. But anyhooo, i'll make sure i'll change

deadlock said he forfeited, but since you guys are still voting, i am ok with whateve happens next

anywayzz
Friendly Guy gmv - i think wis was changing the topic abit
Bbob gmv - better points and good hard facts to back it up
Inferno gmv - Both made great points, and it was tough, though inferno's fact on that movie pulled him through in my eyes, gj to both of you's

and good work everybody, and Rad as well for setting this up nicely

[leteunet dan]

Plan-B GMV- He had a extremely good arguement with a lot of evidence
FriendlyGuy GMV- WIS was all over the plave and did not support his topic of smoking should be legal in bars but instead said some bars so he didnt debate his topic well
Anarchy GMV- strong reasons and it was simple

[WIS]

Hey guys. I don't know if you know this. But the actual topic of the debate (and I PM'd RaD for this) is "Smoking in bars should be banned. Professor FG was supposed to be arguing that smoking should be banned in all bars no matter what, and I should be arguing against that. (Basically meaning, smoking should be legal in bars). This was misunderstood as Professor FG thought I was arguing for "Anyone should be able to smoke in any bar", which is not the case. I hope this can be taken into consideration as sever people thought I had tried to "morph" the topic.

In other news.

I vote for:

bbob - This was easy. Made much more sense than the other person.

Plan-B - Because the other person forfeited...?

!#Anarchy - Inferno did not argue his point very well, and brought up irrelevant subjects. (Ancient Egyptians, and such).

[!#Anarchy]

Bbob- Stated his opinion straightforward and did a great job of explaining his side.
Plan-B - Win by default :(
Friendly Guy- Did a great job as well of stating his side of the topic


Gratz to everyone, great job. :)

[FriendlyGuy]

Hey guys. I don't know if you know this. But the actual topic of the debate (and I PM'd RaD for this) is "Smoking in bars should be banned. Professor FG was supposed to be arguing that smoking should be banned in all bars no matter what, and I should be arguing against that. (Basically meaning, smoking should be legal in bars). This was misunderstood as Professor FG thought I was arguing for "Anyone should be able to smoke in any bar", which is not the case. I hope this can be taken into consideration as sever people thought I had tried to "morph" the topic.[/b]
From the forward of RaD's pm you sent to me, this is what it said:

"The statement sais, smoking should not be banned in all bars.

An example. In the Netherlands they will ban smoking in all public area's, including bars, I think this has already been done in GB and some other countries."

But lol, we're debating about the debate :P


My votes:

Anarchy, for making more sense with her arguments

Plan B i guess, but if I r dedlokd had kept going, he was bringing up good points

bbob - i couldn't take the terrible grammar and sentence structure for more than 1 post

OH, i'd also like to suggest for next times topics: Abortion?, the government should take an active role in censorship, something about gay marriage, maybe something about mentally challenged folk, and about immigration (but that's mainly for US people so i dunno)

[bbob]

this is supposed to be harder right?

Patriot act?
Socialism vs. Capitalism?
Abortion sounds like a good topic.
European union, yay or nay?

[leteunet dan]

oh so i see start taking brilliant leteunet dan's topics(patriot act)lol no those sound like sound good ones abortion always a good one european union maybe a little to vague

[Plan-B]

these are topics, i would have 2 do research for.....:(

i barely even understand most of them, and what they are about, but its kool. It'll give me something to learn, instead of plain old skool whcih teach nothing that is interesting.